F.M.CHALKALIS ENERGY MULTIPLIER

2012-01-13T00:01:00.002+02:00

ETHELOTIFLIA

(Willful Blindness)

Happy New Year.
My wish for 2012 is for everyone to have good Health and that there be Peace and Love which unfortunately lessen more and more everyday in our civilization.
The congratulation messages of some people that even equate me to the great Leonardo Da Vinci give me the strength to continue my work.
I did not have the opportunity to study physics. Maybe if I had studied I would have never got involved with this matter.
For many years now, there are scientists shouting that Newton's theory is wrong.
I have also proved that in practice using my invention. Because in my opinion, in this theory the centrifugal force is misestimated and the effect (the phenomenon) of the lever disregarded, as well as Gravity.

Dear fellow humans, considering the amount of information exchange and communication available today, e.g. internet, it really makes me sad to realize that the Willful blindness of a large proportion of humanity place us in a situation, worse than it was in the Middle Ages. They are prisoners of what they have been taught being unable to think on their own.
What I do not understand and troubles me, is that great scientists got to the point of searching the God in CERN and yet they could not change fundamental errors in physics we are being taught for more than 300 years now.
Also, I do not understand the other scientists and leaders of this world, who supposedly care for alternative energy, yet all the various development programs, adopt only solar, wind, bio-fuels, etc. ignoring Gravity, the endless energy to which we owe our existence as written by great scientists such as Stephen Hawking, F.M. Kanarev and others.

These are the latest development updates:

1. Part of Dr. Kanarev 's article “ABOUT THE PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE”, dedicated to the young mechanics of the 10th All-Russian Congress. August 2011.

Link to the document on Google Docs

(You can download the document in PDF format from within google docs link by clicking Ctrl+S )

2. As you can see in the video, the driving system functions with one motor and a single flywheel. Providing the same results with a lot less consumption. It would be ideal with the appropriate tire profile.

3.    In the video you will watch an experiment in which practically, without any electro motion and any need of mathematics, I believe it is being understood, even from the more skeptics, that our system has nothing in common with the ones it is being compared to. Perhaps they will even be able to snap out of their taught physics lethargy and realize the advantages of the triangular shape, the lever and the addition of external pulse motion that make our system functional.
Also It is clearly visible that:
•    With the use of two toothpicks, applied at 510mm distance from the shaft, we can rotate the 50 kg pendulum.
•    The spectacular amount of force cutting a 30x60mm wooden board while the second weight is still located at 32,6 degrees. The wooden board is placed at a distance of 190mm from the shaft, where we have the Maximum power. That equals to only 11% of the force, torque we had at that given moment. Now, consider the size of the force, torque on 180 degrees plus the momentum of centrifugal force on higher rpm.

4.    Output energy, as I wrote before, has to be harvested from the main shaft. Starting when the second weight passes the 0 degree point and ending when the second weight again passes the 180 degrees.
In the example with the painted tube (cylinder) on the main shaft, you may see another way of how I imagine a pulse generator with the magnets build on the main shaft and passing the coils only during the falling. The size of the generator can be increased by adding more magnets in length. Every millimeter away from the diameter of the main shaft is as a loss.
5.    Regarding smaller size constructions, I believe that reading the brilliant example used by Hughe at nexus.2012info.ca is the best way to make you understand why in the past I wrote that if my space allowed it, I would have used heavier weights or longer arm or even both and certainly longer lever.

All efforts are welcome in our fight but in smaller size constructions the results (the effect) will be invisible causing disappointment and misleading evidence. Please do not derogate from the specifications.
Good Luck to everyone.

Fotis Miltiadis Chalkalis

2011-11-06T18:42:00.002+02:00

"He who thinks freely, thinks well" a quote taken from Rigas Feraios

There were moments, while reading some articles and posts, when I felt that this world just doesn’t deserve to be given anything for free.

These were moments of great disappointment and discouragement from the behavior of some people. But still, my personal beliefs for a better future, prevailed.

And as it proves there are many more like me out there, sharing the same beliefs.

I am saluting all the purely thinking fighters for Overunity.

The ones having the power to form their own opinion about what is really happening and do not just follow the opinions and directions of some columnists or organizations that “allegedly” care for our well being.

In the following links you can find out on your own what I am talking about as well as Who are some of these gentlemen that supposedly represent the struggle for a better world.

http://www.politaia.org/freie-energie-2/energiewende-ein-brief-an-greenpeace/comment-page-1/#comment-5073

http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/energysuppression.htm

Just search on your own “who is behind free energy organizations”

As far it concerns these still negatively commenting, I think it is not necessary to repeat the undisputed scientific certifications about its functionality.

Unfortunately, due to lack of specialized electrical knowledge as well as lack of the necessary funds required to order the appropriate pulse generator, I have not yet been able to harvest power out of the device, which though is calculated to be more than 70% usable.

These are the latest data and development:

CHANGES IN THE DRIVING SYSTEM

The driving system is placed at 36° degrees and the first pulse is given while the second weight is located at the 1° degree. As a result, there is Smoother operation, almost silent and impressively less power consumption in the driving system.

ONE MORE ENERGY OUTPUT POINT OF THE SYSTEM

At number 4 of the comments I wrote, I say that special attention should be given to the base and the elastics.

Later I realized that my calculations «300 RPM x 50 kg = 15000 kg / min which means 900 tons per hour » were wrong. I did not calculate that at the 300 RPM of the existing prototype, the main weight is rotating at a speed of 57,650 Km / h and the external weight is rotating (running) at a speed of 126,604 Km / h.

Therefore the pulse pressures are much higher and at 300RPM exceed the 25.000 N

Witnessing the size of that force made me realize that we can get output energy from another point of the system as well. Without changing any of the previous data.

Since then, I have conducted various experiments, trying to convert these pulse pressures to a rotary motion, but with no successful results so far. Other, larger forces, appear in the system, changing the expected behavior.

Some friends advise the use of a piezoelectric system for the collection of that power. Insisting and emphasizing, that this energy alone is enough.

Unfortunately I have no knowledge of this technology, nor access to it.

This innovation has been donated and belongs to humanity.

Hopping to the help of Every One of Us for further development.

In the past I have written about who I am and how I work. I have never asked for anything personally.

A kind request. It would be great, if anyone willing and able to help in any way to this effort, would communicate through email.

Fotios M. Chalkalis

Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis

2011-09-09T15:40:00.014+03:00

To all of you who are fighting for a better tomorrow.

After the donation of my innovation I have been following various matters about Over-unity and I realized that the ridicule is much larger than one can imagine.

Thankfully nowadays, we have the ability to communicate through the Internet, so I decided to share some of my thoughts with you, being certain that we over match those fighting against us.

I do understand that, in a world where energy is of such great importance, huge interests are being affected and that many people are getting paid to write articles in order to mislead any free energy quest.

After my donation I saw that there are some inventions out there, that in my opinion, can be exploited.

So I am wondering:

Why isn’t there an International independent evaluation committee?

Where are the majority of Universities? Where are the various governments that are supposedly interested in green energy?

where are the green political parties of the world?
Where are the various activist organizations like Greenpeace etc. ? or the institutions like Max Plank, Panacea, etc.

The size of mockery and especially from whom we consider as representatives of the Over-unity quest, you can understand on your own by reading the following:

On the 9^TH of July 2010, I saw the PesWiki page concerning my innovation, in which was written the opinion of the great Expert Mr. Lindemann, according to the presentation that Mr. Sterling does.

I do not doubt that Mr. Feldenberger’s innovation proves gain

Yet, Mr. Lindemann’s comments that Feldenberger’s device does function but Chalkalis invention doesn’t, is something that concerned many people.

During the past 14 months, there have been several interesting articles documenting the operating principle of my innovation by a number of people as well by academics in America and Russia. Even technical characteristics and performance analysis were published based on the prototype.

(the document is in Russian but you can use an online translator).

Friends informed me that articles published on other sites & forums concerning my innovation have been sent to Peswiki though nothing was ever published. Despite the promises of Mr. Sterling to inform of any updates.

I have personally emailed to Mr. Sterling three times.

In the last one, asking from the “internationally renowned representative of Over Unity” as I called Mr. Sterling, to answer Why?

from F.M. CHALKALIS f.m.chalkalis@gmail.com

to sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com
date Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:26 PM

Subject Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis (OS: F. M. Chalkalis Gravity Wheel)

mailed-by gmail.com

Respectable Mr. Sterling D.A.

On July 9, 2010 I read that you have made a PESWiki page, informing and reviewing my innovation.

Ever since there have been several publications providing the scientific documentation

and mathematical analysis of the functionality of my innovation.

Unfortunately, I do not see any update on the PESWiki page.

A friend from the forum told me that he have emailed you concerning the new data a few time ago.

But still, no update on your side. I have personally emailed you my letter from 25 June 2011

which includes all links and updates as well as my personal thanking to you for your help on making my innovation known.

Once more, no update on your side.

Before I form my final opinion out of my many thoughts, I consider it as a human obligation from the person that is established as the representative of pure energy systems internationally, to give me an answer?

Sincerely yours

Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis

Unfortunately I never got a reply nor was anything published.

Therefore, I assumed that the permanent advertisement on Peswiki pages with the photo of Mr. Lindemann, who’s reliability got under question, could be the obvious answer.

Lately I found out that the Chalkalis page of the PesWiki stopped showing up on Google search results.

A few days ago, I was surprised to see that the Peswiki page reappeared within the first results on Google search.

Reading it, I saw the old text dated from 9 July 2010 where Mr. Sterling says that “If it so happens that I'm wrong, and this is a true free energy design, then my guess is that it works because it uses some of the same principles of secondary oscillation gain described by Milkovic.”

I believe that it is obvious to anyone, that my innovation by the specific rotating body shape, the added external force, till the placement of the driving system at the specific point and the ability to control the speed (the performance) of the device just like on an ordinary internal combustion engine etc. does not have anything in common with Mr. Milkovic’s Two-Stage Oscillator.

Also according to your opinion, that my invention doesn’t work, I do not understand how is it that 408 watts* “presents physical dangers and noise problems”. (*common Coffeemaker wattage = 1,050 W)

And although, there are publications on various sites, where scientists arguing about the actual degree of energy multiplication of my innovation and while Dr. Kanarev characterizes it as a new exploitable energy source, the Peswiki page seemed the same like the first day.
( click on the photo for full size )

According to the “Peswiki OS: F. M. Chalkalis Gravity Wheel” page info though, the page was last modified on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 08:36:49

( click on the photo for full size )

With out mentioning any of the updated data on my invention that have been posted online by discrete scientists and universities.

The altered text now contains the following two new sentences:

1) “The two connected weights near the periphery are accelerated by two motorized bicycle wheels as they pass the 1-O'clock position” Added as a description of the driving system’s flywheels that weight 15 kg and simplifies the 42⁰ degrees that the driving system is as “1 –O’clock”.

2) “But before you launch into replicating, I suggest you read the comment we received from Peter Lindemann.” Placed on a prominent position directing to Lidermann’s comments where he advises that no one should deal (get involved) with my invention.

I can’t stop wondering what the aim of that disorientation is.

Mr.Sterling, if you want people to believe that you are really struggling for the OverUnity then please apologize and give us some explanations.

Otherwise, I guess that anyone reading this will make his own conclusion on what you really represent.

Fotios M. Chalkalis

A Big Thank You!

2011-06-25T12:13:00.001+03:00

A year following the donation of my innovation, reviewing everything, I feel obliged to thank every fellow-combatant fighting for a better future.

In the process there were some people as Mr.Rickoff who saw that my innovation practically works and tried repeatedly and with great enthusiasm to explain it unfortunately unsuccessfully.

On the other hand, there were also some people with sterile minds and extreme points of view who by no means can represent the Over-Unity quest. These people tried to blacken my work and present me as irrational by making strange and ridiculous questions such as:

“If it works, then why didn’t he finish it before donating it?”

Like I was obligated to deliver them something complete.

“Why didn’t he use a “car generator” in order to output electricity?”

They also claimed to have built replicas which did not work, trying blatantly to prevent anyone from dealing with it.

Well, Gentlemen as I have previously written I wasn’t able to complete my work for personal reasons. Moreover, anyone must know how demanding as well as costly this kind of perennial experiments are.

Today, without the fear of being misinterpreted, I can tell you that I am just a private person working from the garage of my home. Whatever I have achieved was done through personal work and personal funding. With the firm belief that, for all the great monuments in our history, only gravitation could have provided the necessary energy.

I would like to express my gratitude for all your help.

Your articles and your interest led to learn about it worldwide.

Resulting, people who see beyond the taught physics, to look into it and to provide the scientific proves and documentation of the Fundamental Operating Principle of my innovation.

I will only mention two of them who with their ideas really helped the further development of my device.

The great russian scientist Dr.F.M.Kanaref

PENDULUM F. M. Chalkalis - a talented inventor

And the gentleman with the nickname Gravity Blog in energeticforum.com

I also present some improvement instructions.

In the prototype there is a radius (blade) of 112 cm which translates to

diameter =224cm. Thus a perimeter of 703cm. The contact points of the pulse transmission of movement are in total 6cm (2x3 cm).This means that only in the 0.85% of the perimeter of the cycle we give this little energy that we need. However, in the existent system the motors continue to work during the whole rotation.

We could use a pneumatic system in order to consume power only on a pulse strike on every rotation.

Or as proposed by GravityBlog, a harmonic drive system. Which looks ideal however I do not know how much it would cost either how much energy it would consume to give us a strike of 5 kg in each rotation.

All these years that I have been dealing with it through many different experiments, I have seen so many things that the only fact I may tell with certainty is that a rotating body especially in free fall acceleration is for me an unexplored aspect of physics.

Really important role is played by the size of the body (mass), the way it is being pushed, the way it is connected to the main shaft , etc.

A special material as light as possible that connects the body to the shaft gives much better results. As far as getting energy is concerned, I insist on the main shaft but I am not sure of the ideal solution :

The pulse generator that many suggest today and as has already been referred to by n84dafun almost a year ago.

Or the use of a harmonic drive as proposed by GravityBlog which sounds really interesting though I do not know many things about.

There have been many reports concerning the noise of the machine. The noise comes from the wooden structure of the system and the hard tires that have been used. If the chassis was made of metal the noise will be eliminated.

Many times I have read about little replicas and I have seen enough that bring no similarity to the specifications of the prototype. Do not waste your time in vain.

Dear Roland although your thought is very interesting, the speed that something like that could happen is incredibly high and most likely unrealistic for our construction.

A special thanks to Mr.Ash (panacea-bocaf.org) and to Mr. Sterling D. A. (peswiki.com) for their help on making it known.

I wish you all Health and Peace.

F.M.Chalkalis
I apologize for my poor English. It is not my native language.

15 July 2010

2010-07-15T18:40:00.000+03:00

Hello to all friends in the blogs and forums,

I will try to clarify on some questions and give some advices. On this innovation I have dedicated a big part of my life and in my writings I emphasize that I do not have the means to perfect it. I have declared that I am ready to help where I can and to share my experiences.
Some are saying that I should have first make it perfect and then to donate it. I am sorry I could not do it.
Some others comment on my math, they reject the innovation and discourage people from to deal with it. I'm afraid that pretty soon they might even doubt the physical phenomena exploited.

I did not ask anyone for money. I shared my innovation and I am hopping, with your help, to make a better tomorrow.

After finding that right after a few turns, the force required to complete the rotation is less and as speed increases it gets even lower and also that during the fall between 0 and 180 degrees, in my opinion, there is a surplus of energy,

I have tried for many years to use electromagnetism and many other ways in order to complete the rotation. Until I ended up with the simple way I presented you.

The amount of power we referred to is calculated based on the torque and speed and is clearly more than the input power the system needs. About the “How” and the “How much” of this energy we can harvest, I have my opinion that you may read below and I hope that together we may find a better solution.

Answers to your questions & how I would go on

1) I respect your suggestions however I would ask you at this stage to stay with the provisions of the plans. Many commented on the size of the structure but a miniature requires very specialized materials.

2) If your space allows it I would advise you to lengthen the distance of the center of weight from the axis with 10 more cm and the remaining blade (lever) with 15 cm. Certainly maintain the size of the weight. In the experiments I've done the greater the torque, the better it works.

3) The drive wheels are at 42 degrees. The total weight of the driving wheels is 15 kg (2 x 7, 5 kg) corresponding to three times the weight (force) needed in order to complete a rotation when it starts with no speed.

4) The driving system would require two enhanced soft wheels that do not swell (not changing their diameter) at high speeds. The size of the wheel determines the rate of transmission speed and power consumption. Eg the bigger the wheel the higher the rate of transmission speed. With a smaller wheel we have much less power consumption but lower rates of transmission speed. That is why it would be preferable to use a high speed motor with RPM controller.

Example from the existing prototype

Total arm length of 1,12m Χ 2 = 2,24m Χ 3,14= 7,0336 m perimeter.

Diameter of the driving wheel 0.3 m X 3,14 = 0.9420 m.

7,0336 / 0.9420 = 7.4666 times. This means that when our driving wheels run at 3000 rpm, we have on the main shaft 401 rpm, minus about 8% loss. This shows us that all three rotating objects are running with the same speed. While the energy consumption of the drive system is really small compared to what the rotating 278Nm have.

5) ) Power can be exploited only from the main shaft. It is the most efficient point, because all the forces in such high speeds are consolidated. For example when our rotating weight is located at either 180° or at 320° degrees it has the same amount of power. Besides if we try to get energy from the outer perimeter we will neutralize the properties of the lever.

6) Two motors of 1 or 1,5 Kw each if possible at 10.000 rpm , with speed control.

7) To place the whole system underground.

8) To get at the desirable amount of rpm and to connect the appropriate mechanism on our main shaft.

9) Another thought I had but I could not accomplish (experiment with) is that after we have placed it underground to run it with over 1000 rpm and with a gearbox to downgrade it at 200 rpm and then I would connect a generator such as those used in hydro systems.

A thank you too all people from the Forums & Blogs that look with interest in it.

F.M.Chalkalis

ENERGY MULTIPLIER

2010-06-26T12:48:00.016+03:00

We all know about the inexhaustible energy produced by gravity. Through the years a lot of people have tried and are still trying to make use of it, especially nowadays that the energy problems are so serious.

As far as I know, a lot of inventions have been made regarding this resource but none has been exploitable.

After 28 years of hard work, many disappointments, personal expenses and the valuable help of my son in the last couple of years, I have recently ended up with the conclusion of something unbelievably simple. So simple that many people could build it on their own.

Just by making use of common known natural phenomena such as the earth’s attraction (gravitational force), centrifugal power, the lever, the flywheel etc

It is about a mechanism that multiplies any kind of kinetic energy by 800% to 1100% and functions with speed regulation as a common motor.

The referred data are based on an already existing prototype that has been constructed with simple materials.

It could also be auto supplied (run on its own power) with the appropriate technical means which unfortunately I do not have. It is absolutely friendly to the environment, its functionality and performance are not affected by weather conditions and it has a low cost of construction.

For greater needs, more than one mechanism can be connected by freewheels and work independently transmitting their power to a single drive shaft.

Before the presentation of the video and the designs that are attached regarding its construction, I must conclude by saying that if people lived in harmony with nature and paid more attention to its laws and the way it works without “abusing” it, a lot of our problems would have been solved.

This innovation is donated to humanity and I’m hoping for your help to make it known and useful to all.

Yours Sincerely

F.M.Chalkalis.

GENERAL CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION

Two metal blades 1.12m long are connected on an axis in an angle of 60° forming an equilateral triangle.

On each metal blade at a 510mm distance from the axis, there is the center of an aerodynamic shape lead disk. (2 equal disks of 45,69kg total weight.)

The rest 610mm of the metal blade, calculating from the center of each disk, work as a lever.

The metal blades at the length of 1,12m are connected with each other by a tube filled with lead, weighing 4,5kg which increases the total power and which is also part of the halting system.

Following the principles of free fall and centrifugal force the disks cover the 92% of a full rotation.

For instance in order to complete a full rotation from point “zero” (12 o’clock) of a 50kg weight thanks to the lever only 5kg of force is needed.

The transmission of motion to the rotating weight is achieved with 2 wheels similar to the baseball throwing mechanism.

The wheels weigh 15kg which corresponds to the 30% of the rotating weight and they function as flywheels.

FUNCTIONING DESCRIPTION

At the prototype we use electric energy from a 24v battery to power on the motors (wheels) and then the initial motion is given by hand.

Between the battery and the motors is placed a speed regulator.

1)Example with a consumption of 17Α x 24v = 408 w with 160 RPM we have at our drive shaft 4,657Kw which equals to 11,42 times more.

2)Using other set of motors with consumption 45Α x 24v = 1,08Κw with 300 RPM we have 8,73Kw which equal to 8 times more.

The difference comes from the motor’s coefficient of performance (COP).

Calculation method:

Central weight F 45,69Kg = 448,2Ν ∙ r 0,51m = 228.58Nm ∙ 160 RPM ÷ 9550 = 3,829Κw

Additional weight F 4,5Kg = 44,145Ν ∙ r 1,12m = 49.44Nm ∙ 160 RPM ÷ 9550 = 0,828Κw
Tot. 4,657Κw

In a space of 60m² we can place 60 units connected all together with a total output of 6706Kw/24h on the common drive shaft.

Mixed performance 6706,00 Kw /24h
Consumption 587,52 Kw /24h
Final power on the drive shaft 6118,48 Kw /24h

COMMENTS

All the pre-mentioned data are according to the existing prototype and can be augmented

1) With specialized materials

2) By increasing the parameters Weight, arm length, lever length and rotations per minute.

3) By placing the mechanism underground where the air resistance is less and furthermore it is safer as accidents are avoided.

4) The base and the elastics used to absorb vibrations must be reinforced as they are under a lot of pressure.

E.g.: At 300 RPM x 50 kg = 15000 kg /min which means 900 tons per hour.

These results are indicative of the space I am working at and they increase if the RPM increase.

to download the schemes right click and save as...