Google Translate

AUTOMATIC TRANSLATION IS NOT ALWAYS ACCURATE

Automatic Translation is Not Always Accurate.

Friday, December 30, 2016

Happy New Year 2017

Dear friends,
Some health problems are the reason that I have not contacted you for long time. I wish you many happy years to come with health, love and peace in your home and all around the world.  I wish that in 2017 there are no paranoid, hypocrites and bellicose politicians and there are no wars.
F.M.Chalkalis

Friday, September 12, 2014

Dear friends,
This is an update for all the friends interested in free energy and my work.
Studying on the internet the presentation of plenty of inventions that rely their functioning on magnetism I thought it could be an ideal solution for the driving system of our invention. Unfortunately, after a year of working on that perspective, I can state that magnetism can be used only in small systems not requiring high performance.  That is because the power of an engine depends upon the size of the torque and the speed.
 In order to accelerate a rotating / moving body, we must first reach its speed, something that with magnets is impossible because although we can adjust the strength of a magnet, we may not adjust it’s attracting speed which as I recently found out can reach the speed of light. So when we try to increase the speed of a moving object, we instantly hit ( bang on) it and that results in its resistance as very accurately described by Newton.  That is why I believe that no free energy device based on magnetism could ever function.
For all those who work with magnetism and may want to prove me wrong in my conclusions, I say that I would be more than happy to work with them on the question, or to present us with some serious device with high performance capability and not the toys we see. I believe that magnetism maybe could be used in some compressor system.
Also for the self hallucinations of those who work with the known gravity devices based on the weight shifting, such a device may not function producing high performance due to the fact that power is the repetition of torque. Increasing the speed though, activates other forces like the centrifugal that cancels the initial operating principle of the device.
The only one on a different but still right path, in my opinion, out of all that work with gravity devices like us, is Mr. Milkovitch. Unfortunately until today he did not achieve what he truly believes and is  feasible.
Dear friends, until now besides the two innovations you know I inform you that the piezoelectric energy harvesting systems applied on gravity devices has unbelievable results and with unique potentials of a device with unlimited size, regulated - controlled speed and regulated - controlled depth of pulses. In a research I did, all companies that I found online, deal with miniature constructions. The only research center I found and got in touch with was the piezoinstitute where a Ms. Wanda Wolny in charge, forwarded me to someone of her ex co-workers working as a private researcher on piezoelectric, based in Denmark. But  Dr. K.B. got very interested in where I locate and nothing more.
I am afraid that that is the way most research centers function nowadays, living richly upon us. All the hallucinations for free and sufficient energy are highly costly and devastating to our future. The failure to utilize the attraction of the earth is not due to lack of technology but rather to the interests and the directed immaturity and the unreadiness of mankind for free energy.
F.M.Chalkalis

Friday, August 2, 2013



Dear friends,

Observing on the internet all that great interest that so many people have in the numerous renewable energy systems, I feel obliged to convey my thoughts to you. 

In the two links following, you can read some of my letters sent to official bodies and I guess they were cast into the trash as nothing ever reported on. You will understand the magnitude of the delusion and ridicule served to us while they are only serving their personal interests by feeding us several new purported inventions. Or even by lecturing and by promoting programs like the greatest crime of the century, the cultivation of crops not to be used for food but for energy production. Google docs:
1) Letter to the 12th EUFORES meeting 23 & 24 November 2012 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TC39Xw3IXaG76QoHfyrdpk3KbRXbj6L4Pl-dA0teQ_4/edit?pli=1
2) Letter to the Sixth Conference on Future Energy (11-12 July 2013 University of Maryland)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wj4XeCAa7MFgOnNYy83UWXThalhIYmqLnv1y76OGPcU/edit?pli=1 

I personally believe that the issue is political and concerns us all.
I am convinced that only together we can awaken our politicians lying into lethargy.

Best regards
F.M.Chalkalis

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Update May 2013



Respectable friends, I apologize for not being able to reply on each of your email and messages, individually.

I inform you that there are improvements in our system.  Adding one more natural phenomenon, I am trying and I think that it will work without any external input in the future.  The plans I have on my mind are that gravitation combined with other natural phenomena can even move a car.

You write to me that I should place a generator. I do not have the ability to order the appropriate generator, but I am not ready either. Nor I judge the timing suitable to present it.  The only thing that we will manage would be to allow them to steal from us.

Reading the following, you will understand what I am talking about.

M. Dmitriev , as he declares, patented “his” idea.  Mr. Sterling, not only didn’t  mention that the driving system, that Dmitriev patented, is F.M.Chalkalis’s but even offered his help to Mr. Dmitriev.
 (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Mikhail_Dmitriev_Gravity_Wheel)
(http://realstrannik.ru/forum/19-svobodnaya-energiya/82713-gravitaczionnyj-dvigatel-mf-dmitrieva.html#98167)
But neither someone of the honest free energy fighters, said something about it.

To place a generator, any kind, in order to demonstrate that it works?  To whom?  To all of those that cannot even comprehend the amount of torque, power that we have in comparison to the insignificant amount of energy required to function the system. I believe it is pointless. Considering that I have even been called an idiot. 

For anyone that wishes to engage seriously, the base of my idea and the scientific analysis are public.

Not though, for appropriating my ideas.

F.M.Chalkalis

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Merry Christmas and Happy 2013

I wish you all the best health, love and peace to your homes and to the whole planet.
Many of you ask for plans and the exact amount of power on the system. We rotate 45kg (99 pounds) at 380 RPM using power equivalent to only 2% of the rotating mass, without taking under consideration the centrifugal force.
I cannot even theoretically calculate the exact power of the system as I do not know how the bended arm torque is calculated and till now I had no answer to my public question on the subject. I will write back when I will have any update.
Also for your information, I am publishing the letter I send to the administration of  EUFORES and to the vice president Mrs. Anni Podimata. 


[ Respectable Ladies and Gentlemen, of the 12th EUFORES Inter-Parliamentary Meeting.
My name is Fotios M. Chalkalis. Believing in the unlimited energy of Gravitation, I deal all my life and I already have indisputable results that have been analyzed and confirmed by internationally renowned scientists.
Dear representatives, of the 503 million people, please discuss the theme of Gravity and give as an official answer on why gravitation as an energy source is not included in the various programs of research & development like solar, wind, geothermal etc. and you can trace all energy forms back to its root form gravity. (Link) 
Clarifying it, do consider the results of the hydroelectric power plants with the great efficiency rate of 90%, which is a derivative of Gravitation.  I hope this forum to give an answer on why Gravity continues to be ignored, the endless energy to which we owe our existence as written by great scientists such as Stephen Hawking ( his book: “The Grand Design”),  F.M. Kanarev  and others.  Sincerely  F.M.Chalkalis ]
 
Unfortunately the subject was not discussed on their meeting on 23 & 24-11-2012. The “great” politicians and science experts probably continue not to consider Earth’s attraction as an energy source. Unless there are other reasons.
Happy holydays
F.M.Chalkalis

F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier No.2 (Reloaded)

I would like to inform you that the YouTube video uploaded on the 20th Dec. 2012 is the same video as the one that has been online since 18th Sept. 2012.
Unfortunately it has been “click bombed” resulting the loss of the about 18.000 views as well as the comments. 


Some of the comments that have been saved:

 1.    CHALKALIS says:
December 5, 2012 at 8:24 pm
The specific construction (model) of the 45 kg and 45cm arm at 380RPM I have calculate its rated power at 7.9Kw.  The 50KW generator would require a proportional construction.
____________

2.     USAEVANTOLICO says:
December 5, 2012 at 9:13 pm
Is possible this fly arm run a generator 50 kw?
____________
3.     xvolodea says:
December 5, 2012 at 9:21 pm
All our respects Mr Calkalis for your work. Can you give us more information on your new invention, degrees between the arms, the distance from the driving shaft and the weight of every red ball. Thank you
____________
4.     Carlos Ucrós Piedrahita says:
December 5, 2012 at 9:24 pm
Mr Ron if you send me the R.P.M. YOUR PRODUCT AND ENGINE TORQUE INPUT AND OUTPUT TORQUE MOTOR I give you the perfect operation KEY NOTE THAT THIS MOTOR is 1,700 RPM O ME equiboco know this system and are the revolutions in the input are in the output if ME sends that data will tell you what you MUST DO THAT WHICH HAS INBERCION GREETINGS ECHA.
____________
5.     W32DEFENDER says:
December 5, 2012 at 9:42 pm
Mr. Chalkalis,
I didn’t find any information on how the bended arm is calculated. I really hope someone with the appropriate knowledge will write on that question soon.
Best regards
W32
____________
6.     CHALKALIS says:
December 5, 2012 at 10:41 pm
It is not as you write, it only needs a small amount of energy but it needs it. According to my calculations, in order to complete the circle, it requires 0,02 % weight of what we rotate, without counting the centrifugal force. Vacuum would be ideal. You ask about the size of the force of the system. I cannot estimate precisely, because I do not know. Is all the bended arm length calculated? Or just the distance in a straight line between the body and the axle? You have any idea on that?
____________
7.     W32DEFENDER says:
December 5, 2012 at 11:16 pm
Mr. F.M. Chalkalis, my congratulations on your new invention and a sincere thank you for all that you are doing. If we take under consideration the frictions, it looks to me that it requires energy only during acceleration. If I do understand it correctly then you have made a miracle. I would be grateful if you could you please tell me the estimated power that this system has on the axis.
Best regards
W32
____________
8.     derekvolt says:
December 5, 2012 at 11:51 pm
My thinking on this is, with the efficiency of this system why not use a pulse dc motor to drive and collect the energy out by an alternator via pulley. Just a thought.
____________
9.     purelyprimitives says:
December 6, 2012 at 12:41 am
I’m glad to see that you have redesigned this with balanced weight instead of the rotating pendulum design. You will still need to show how this is somehow better than a simple flywheel though. I look forward to your next video.
____________
10.     MagnaMoRo says:
December 6, 2012 at 1:33 am
All flywheels store energy, even out of balance flywheels (pendulums). But alone they do not produce Over-unity. For over-unity, you need more.
See the MagnaMoRo YouTube channel videos for the clues.
____________
11.     superhotbm says:
December 6, 2012 at 2:21 am
Golden ratio spiral maybe.
____________
12.     CHALKALIS says:
December 6, 2012 at 2:23 am
Dear Knovos or chalkalisreplication,
I have told you before that it is not easy for me to reply to all posts. I can see that you have been dealing with your attempt for some time now, so I am going to ask you before you post again, to compare the replica you have made to the specifications and the instructions I gave.
I have tried to share all my ideas and knowledge with the world. I am sorry if you cannot understand me, I really hope that someone does so I won’t take it with me.
____________
13.     ara7878 says:
December 6, 2012 at 2:24 am
Большое спасибо за откровенное и правдивое видео которое доказывает как скептикам так и сомневающимся тот факт что свободная энергия существует достаточно понять сам принцип получения энергии как его можно сделать на любом технике. Пожалуйста опишите параметры груза – массу и размеры что бы как можно больше людей могли повторить само устройство. Это нужно уже не нам а нашим детям нашей экологии всему человечеству- большое спасибо
____________
14.     chalkalisreplication says:
December 6, 2012 at 2:37 am
What makes it so special to answer people. I have tried to replicate your invention and I failed because I put a load on it. If you keep showing great inventions which have no output I’m afraid you take this all with you in your grave.
____________
15.     CHALKALIS says:
December 6, 2012 at 2:50 am
Dear Sir,
I rarely answer to comments. I have seen your replica, which has nothing in common with what I have presented. Ascertaining your big technical skills, I have to ask your point of view on how any generator can be used for any purpose. Are all these people looking for specialized generators just fools? After all, do not forget that you have been warned a year ago that your replication would never work.
____________
16.     chalkalisreplication says:
December 6, 2012 at 3:25 am
I really don’t understand mister Chalkalis! What is the difficulty to hook on a car generator. With your mechanical skills that must be so simple. You got the knowledge to show us a 24 volts power supply and you know you must show us what Amp draw the machines takes with the amp meter. 24 volt X 10Amp = 240 watt. I have built a small version of your device and with a load the machine slows down and stops. Please hook on a car generator and use the power that comes out to run something.
____________
17.     harpbloke says:
December 6, 2012 at 3:59 am
brilliant.
____________ 



Hello,

Good work, a nice proof..!
Gravity potential must be the best resouce for a cleaner future.
Don't give up, keep your good work running.
I wish you the best.
____________
Hello mr Fotios,
Your first multipier,about two years ago,seemed to me a little
bit "simplisitic" in engineering terms,considering my 33-years
professional experience in structural mechanics as a fair reason
for scepticism.
But then I read the "perpetuum mobile" article of worldwide
respectable prof. Philipp M.Kanarev furnishing the mathematical
proof about COP of your multipier pendulum by virtue of his
"FIRST NEW LAW OF CLASSICAL DYNAMICS".
After this "revelation" I started studying frantically all the
available in english scientific papers and books of prof.Kanarev..
Now I think that everything about "free energy" is sufficiently
clear to me from another point of view..
So,when I saw your new multiplier ver.II video,I almost felt no
surprise,only enthusiasm.
It is exactly what I expected from a dedicated inventive man like
you..
To realize that your unselfish giving continues with another
innovating evolution of the original multiplier.
I think that now your invention deserves much more attention from
the so called "alternative energy supporters".
I have to apologize for just staring for two years without giving
any financial,technical or even mental support to this brave work.
And I promise this is gonna change as soon as possible..
Long live GREECE! A.M.
 ____________
Dear friends,

I am writing in public, because it is difficult to answer on the subject at every one individually.

The good wishes and kind words of your emails, are touching me deeply and help me morally. THANK YOU!

I apologize for not answering, to your emails, offering to help with donations.

My resources are limited but if I had the financial means, I could present, with the appropriate technicians and materials, something completed perfected, so that the world could be persuaded that the power of Earth’s attraction can be used just like any other energy source (liquid fuels, hydrogen, wind, sun, ect) which all trace back to its root form gravity as mentioned by Byron (http://forums.alternative-energy-news.info/thread-86-post-1156.html#pid1156). Plus that energy from Gravity is totally green, perpetual, unlimited and free.

Perhaps if we gather more people or there was a financial sponsor or even the creation of a nonprofit organization, could make reality all that I wrote.

F.M.Chalkalis
____________ 
Hi again,

I've sent the comment on september 28th.

Unless the big potential of a new invention RELATED WITH ENERGY, like your work, last years I have learned and suffered in my skin, that after a good technical achievement and results beside how many people can benefits with these applications, we must LOOK the few people who might be harmed after these applications. Great economical interests which controls governments are dangerous.

I continue with my private research, and only after seen the propper conditions can be realesed into public.

You have disclosed before time, beside this I try to help in which I can.

FMconceptz

____________ 
Fantastic article. Gravity prospective must be the best source for a better upcoming. To understand that your un-selfish providing carries on with another searching for progress of the unique multiplier. I think that now your innovation should get much more interest from the so known as "alternative power supporters". Country Reports
____________
Can we get one plan about this mashine?
I like it. Thank you!

UC
 ___________

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

F.M.Chalkalis Energy Multiplier No.2

It has been about two years since the publication of my innovation, in which I basically show that in order to exploit earth's attraction, we must initially add external energy as in any combustion engine.  Today, we have scientific confirmation of its functionality with mathematical explanations and analyses.
Some people's comment that if it works I should place a generator, even to use one from a car, in order to I show them that we have more energy. (overunity)

 I DECLARE
1) As I've written in the past, my electrical knowledge as well as the means available to me are meager if not completely missing.

 2) I have NO obligation to anyone to prove something and in particular to persons that cannot estimate the torque and force that we have in the axis of the system, in relation to the energy required in order to operate the system.

I do know that someone's interests are at stake. I have my doubts about those who govern us as well as about some organized activists, supposedly fighting for a better world.  If they are really interested, why don't they change the system of registration of innovations?  Why do they force most inventors to take their innovations to the grave with them? All it requires is a law where you have the first publication to protect the rights of an inventor.

I have donated the work of life with the belief that there are people that can benefit of my idea and of what I show and explain. From the comments that I am receiving until today, I understand that some people act ironically and negatively to anything that goes beyond of their limited knowledge as well as that their inability to analyze something new, before expressing their negative opinion.

Honorable ladies and gentlemen, irrelevantly of all the above mentioned and with the hope of a better tomorrow, I am presenting you my latest work. Believing that the exploitation of gravity is subject of geometric relations and proportions of the rotated bodies, I am showing you today in video, my new innovation. A revolution in free energy, a phenomenon which I believe that finally opens the way for the exploitation of the inexhaustible energy source of earth's gravity.

A big thank you to all of you who were involved and all of you who encouraged me with your good words. Especially to Dr. F.M.Kanarev.

The video that you will see is clear enough and probative.

The rotating mass is 45 kilograms with arm length 700mm.

This innovation is a donation for any non commercial use.
Commercial use can be carried out only with the written consent of the inventor.
Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis

Friday, January 13, 2012

ETHELOTIFLIA
 (Willful Blindness)
Happy New Year.
My wish for 2012 is for everyone to have good Health and that there be Peace and Love which unfortunately lessen more and more everyday in our civilization.
The congratulation messages of some people that even equate me to the great Leonardo Da Vinci give me the strength to continue my work.
I did not have the opportunity to study physics. Maybe if I had studied I would have never got involved with this matter. 
For many years now, there are scientists shouting that Newton's theory is wrong.
I have also proved that in practice using my invention. Because in my opinion, in this theory the centrifugal force is misestimated and the effect (the phenomenon) of the lever disregarded, as well as Gravity.

Dear fellow humans, considering the amount of information exchange and communication available today, e.g. internet, it really makes me sad to realize that the Willful blindness of a large proportion of humanity   place us in a situation, worse than it was in the Middle Ages. They are prisoners of what they have been taught being unable to think on their own.
What I do not understand and troubles me, is that great scientists got to the point of searching the God in CERN and yet they could not change fundamental errors in physics we are being taught for more than 300 years now.
Also, I do not understand the other scientists and leaders of this world, who supposedly care for alternative energy, yet all the various development programs, adopt only solar, wind, bio-fuels, etc. ignoring Gravity, the endless energy to which we owe our existence as written by great scientists such as Stephen Hawking,  F.M. Kanarev  and others.
 

These are the latest development updates:

1.    Part of  Dr. Kanarev 's  article “ABOUT THE PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE”, dedicated to the young mechanics of the 10th  All-Russian Congress. August 2011.
(You can download the document in PDF format from within google docs link by clicking  Ctrl+S )
 
2.    As you can see in the video, the driving system functions with one motor and a single flywheel. Providing the same results with a lot less consumption. It would be ideal with the appropriate tire profile. 

3.    In the video you will watch an experiment in which practically, without any electro motion and any need of mathematics, I believe it is being understood, even from the more skeptics, that our system has nothing in common with the ones it is being compared to. Perhaps they will even be able to snap out of their taught physics lethargy and realize the advantages of the triangular shape, the lever and the addition of external pulse motion that make our system  functional.
Also It is clearly visible that:
•    With the use of two toothpicks, applied at 510mm distance from the shaft, we can rotate the 50 kg pendulum.
•    The spectacular amount of force cutting a 30x60mm wooden board while the second weight is still located at 32,6 degrees. The wooden board is placed at a distance of 190mm from the shaft, where we have the Maximum power. That equals to only 11% of the force, torque we had at that given moment.  Now, consider the size of the force, torque on 180 degrees plus the momentum of centrifugal force on higher rpm. 

4.    Output energy, as I wrote before, has to be harvested from the main shaft. Starting when the second weight passes the 0 degree point and ending when the second weight again passes the 180 degrees.
In the example with the painted tube (cylinder) on the main shaft, you may see another way of how I imagine a pulse generator with the magnets build on the main shaft and passing the coils only during the falling. The size of the generator can be increased by adding more magnets in length. Every millimeter away from the diameter of the main shaft is as a loss.
5.    Regarding smaller size constructions, I believe that reading the brilliant example used by Hughe at nexus.2012info.ca  is the best way to make you understand why in the past I wrote that if my space allowed it, I would have used heavier weights or longer arm or even both and certainly longer lever.  

All efforts are welcome in our fight but in smaller size constructions the results (the effect) will be invisible causing disappointment and misleading evidence. Please do not derogate from the specifications.
Good Luck to everyone.

Fotis Miltiadis Chalkalis


Sunday, November 6, 2011

"He who thinks freely, thinks well" a quote taken from Rigas Feraios
There were moments, while reading some articles and posts, when I felt that this world just doesn’t deserve to be given anything for free.
These were moments of great disappointment and discouragement from the behavior of some people.  But still, my personal beliefs for a better future, prevailed.
And as it proves there are many more like me out there, sharing the same beliefs.
I am saluting all the purely thinking fighters for Overunity.
The ones having the power to form their own opinion about what is really happening and do not just follow the opinions and directions of some columnists  or organizations that  “allegedly”  care for our well being.
In the following links you can find out on your own what I am talking about as well as Who are some of these gentlemen that supposedly represent the struggle for a better world.
Just search on your own “who is behind free energy organizations”

As far it concerns these still negatively commenting, I think it is not necessary to repeat the undisputed scientific certifications about its functionality.
Unfortunately, due to lack of specialized electrical knowledge as well as lack of the necessary funds required to order the appropriate pulse generator, I have not yet been able to harvest power out of the device, which though is calculated to be more than 70% usable.  

These are the latest data and development:

CHANGES IN THE DRIVING SYSTEM
The driving system is placed at 36° degrees and the first pulse is given while the second weight is located at the 1° degree. As a result, there is Smoother operation, almost silent and impressively less power consumption in the driving system. 

ONE MORE ENERGY OUTPUT POINT OF THE SYSTEM
At number 4 of the comments I wrote, I say that special attention should be given to the base and the elastics.
Later I realized that my calculations «300 RPM x 50 kg = 15000 kg / min which means 900 tons per hour » were wrong. I did not calculate that at the 300 RPM of the existing prototype, the main weight is rotating at a speed of 57,650 Km / h and the external weight is rotating (running) at a speed of 126,604 Km / h.
Therefore  the pulse pressures are much higher and at 300RPM exceed the 25.000 N
Witnessing the size of that force made me realize that we can get output energy from another point of the system as well. Without changing any of the previous data.
Since then, I have conducted various experiments, trying to convert these pulse pressures to a rotary motion, but with no successful results so far. Other, larger forces, appear in the system, changing the expected behavior.
Some friends advise the use of a piezoelectric system for the collection of that power. Insisting and emphasizing, that this energy alone is enough.
Unfortunately I have no knowledge of this technology, nor access to it.

This innovation has been donated and belongs to humanity.
Hopping to the help of Every One of Us for further development.
In the past I have written about who I am and how I work. I have never asked for anything personally.
A kind request.  It would be great, if anyone willing and able to help in any way to this effort, would communicate through email.

Fotios M. Chalkalis

Friday, September 9, 2011

Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis

To all of you who are fighting for a better tomorrow.

After the donation of my innovation I have been following various matters about Over-unity and I realized that the ridicule is much larger than one can imagine.
Thankfully nowadays, we have the ability to communicate through the Internet, so I decided to share some of my thoughts with you, being certain that we over match those fighting against us.
I do understand that, in a world where energy is of such great importance, huge interests are being affected and that many people are getting paid to write articles in order to mislead any free energy quest.
After my donation I saw that there are some inventions out there, that in my opinion, can be exploited.
So I am wondering:
Why isn’t there an International independent evaluation committee?
Where are the majority of Universities? Where are the various governments that are supposedly interested in green energy?
 where are the green political parties of the world?
Where are the various activist organizations like Greenpeace etc. ?  or the institutions like  Max Plank,  Panacea, etc.
The size of mockery and especially from whom we consider as representatives of the Over-unity quest, you can understand on your own by reading the following:
On the 9TH of July 2010, I saw the PesWiki page concerning my innovation, in which was written the opinion of the great Expert Mr. Lindemann, according to the presentation that Mr. Sterling does.
I do not doubt that Mr. Feldenberger’s innovation proves gain
Yet,  Mr. Lindemann’s  comments that Feldenberger’s device does function but Chalkalis invention doesn’t, is something that concerned many people.

During the past 14 months, there have been several interesting articles documenting the operating principle of my innovation by a number of people as well  by academics in America and Russia. Even  technical characteristics and performance analysis were published based on the prototype. 
(the document is in Russian but you can use an online translator).


Friends informed me that articles published on other sites & forums concerning my innovation have been sent to Peswiki though nothing was ever published. Despite the promises of Mr. Sterling  to inform of any updates.
I have personally emailed to Mr. Sterling three times.
In the last one, asking from the “internationally renowned representative of Over Unity” as I called  Mr. Sterling, to answer Why? 
from F.M. CHALKALIS f.m.chalkalis@gmail.com
 to sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com
 date
Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:26 PM
 Subject Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis (OS: F. M. Chalkalis Gravity Wheel)
 mailed-by gmail.com
Respectable Mr. Sterling D.A.
On July 9, 2010 I read that you have made a PESWiki page, informing and reviewing my innovation.
Ever since there have been several publications providing the scientific documentation
and mathematical analysis of the functionality of my innovation. 
Unfortunately, I do not see any update on the PESWiki page.
A friend from the forum told me that he have emailed you concerning the new data a few time ago.
But still, no update on your side.  I have personally emailed you my letter from 25 June 2011
which includes all links and updates as well as my personal thanking to you for your help on making my innovation known.
Once more, no update on your side.
Before I form my final opinion out of my many thoughts, I consider it as a human obligation from the person that is established as the representative of pure energy systems internationally, to give me an answer?
Sincerely yours
Fotios Miltiadis Chalkalis 

Unfortunately I never got a reply nor was anything published.
Therefore, I assumed that the permanent advertisement on Peswiki  pages with the photo of Mr. Lindemann, who’s reliability got under question, could be the obvious answer.
Lately I found out that the Chalkalis page of the PesWiki stopped showing up on Google search results.
A few days ago, I was surprised to see that the Peswiki page reappeared within the first results on Google search.
Reading it, I saw the old text dated from 9 July 2010 where Mr. Sterling says that “If it so happens that I'm wrong, and this is a true free energy design, then my guess is that it works because it uses some of the same principles of secondary oscillation gain described by Milkovic.”
I believe that it is obvious to anyone, that my innovation by the specific rotating body shape, the added external force, till the placement of the driving system at the specific point and the ability to control the speed (the performance) of the device just like on an ordinary internal combustion engine etc. does not have anything in common with Mr. Milkovic’s Two-Stage Oscillator.
Also according to your opinion, that my invention doesn’t work, I do not understand how is it that 408 watts* “presents physical dangers and noise problems”. (*common Coffeemaker wattage = 1,050 W
And although, there are publications on various sites, where scientists arguing about the actual degree of energy multiplication of my innovation and while Dr. Kanarev characterizes it as a new exploitable energy source, the Peswiki page seemed the same like the first day. 
( click on the photo for full size )
 According to the “Peswiki OS: F. M. Chalkalis Gravity Wheel” page info though, the page was last modified on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 08:36:49 
( click on the photo for full size )

With out mentioning any of the updated data on my invention that have been posted online by discrete scientists and universities.

The altered text now contains the following two new sentences:
1)      The two connected weights near the periphery are accelerated by two motorized bicycle wheels as they pass the 1-O'clock position Added as a description of the driving system’s flywheels that weight 15 kg and simplifies the 42⁰ degrees that the driving system is  as “1 –O’clock”.
2)      But before you launch into replicating, I suggest you read the comment we received from Peter Lindemann.”   Placed on  a prominent position directing to Lidermann’s comments where he advises  that no one should deal (get involved) with my invention.
I can’t stop wondering what the aim of that disorientation is.
Mr.Sterling, if  you  want people to believe that you are really struggling for the OverUnity then please apologize and give us some explanations.
Otherwise, I guess that anyone reading this will make his own conclusion on what you really represent.
Fotios M. Chalkalis